Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Peter Zumthor Questions

1. How does Peter Zumthor talk about the "Magic of the Real" and explain how this compares, in terms of the subtleties, to Michael Benedikt's "Architecture for Reality"?

Peter Zumthor idea of “Magic of the Real” is about the experience someone has when they are inside of a building or setting. The mood building made by the space available to people. Benedikt’s “Architecture of Reality” is how a person feels in the presence a buildings, space, mass, and composition.

2. Material Compatibility, Temperature of a Space and Levels of Intimacy are some conditions that both Peter Zumthor, in “Atmospheres”, and Richard Serra, in “Weight and Measure”, make a point of articulating when consider space. Where in their explanation of these overlapping conditions are they similar and where do they differ?

Both Serra and Zumthor both deal with the weight of the materials and how it effects your structure, and how this may cause the object or structure to react with peoples sense of space. How it will effect someone’s movement around the object or how the may stand in relation to it. What differs in the ideas of both these architects is how materials temperature can change someone relation to the object.

3. Zumthor looks towards experiential conditions when creating architecture, what are other methods architects use when generating architecture and what is the corresponding building?

Other methods of experimenting and generating architecture can come in the form of modeling before building. Richard Serra for example worked modeling on a 1 - 1 scale before generating his work, so he could see someone’s reaction to a piece he had been working on.

4. For Zumthor at the end of the day, after figuring use, sound, place, light and the other listed conditions, if the coherence isn’t beautiful the process is started again. Beauty is simultaneously subjective for the individual, as held “in the eye of the beholder”, and universally recognizable. Define your subjective understanding of what beautiful architecture is.

 Beautiful architecture is something that cannot fully be explained, rather it is something that must been see in order to get a full effect of why something can be considered beautiful. As Zumthor describes it, is something that even with all the right conditions calculated and brought to a reasonable understanding, by taking a look at the building or structure you can tell if it is beautiful or not. It is something that is felt about the individual in the presence of a structure, that  something just keeps your eye or your senses fixated on it . More often than not you cannot realize if something is beautiful or not without first being able to bring it into the physical state, and then looking back on it you will be able to decide if it is considered beautiful.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Serra Interview Questions


1. What were Richard Serra's goals for the installation?

He wanted to define space with his sculptures, but he didn’t want his works to define the space already placed by the galleries. He also wanted the space to be defined by what he constructed not by the gallery. He wanted to also give each person no matter their size the same experience of scale and wieght.

2. Define the field Serra is referring to when he states that his sculptural elements need to create "enough tension within the field to hold the experience of presence in the place". How do you define "experience of presence"?

The field he is talking about is of the vertical and how his sculptures need to give off a sense of elevation and scale. The scale and dimension in proportion to their bodies is what gives people a presence of the work, so that when they remember the work or the building what they really remember is the proportion of the work to their scale.

3. How do the columns, pedestal condition, octagonal space and vertical axis challenge Serra?

The columns and pedestal gave Serra a challenge by only taking up a certain amount of space but when he used them he found the gallery limited there presence since they over shadowed its height and they didn’t occupy much horizontal space. The octagonal space was seen to have a effect where people kept wanting to stand towards the center of it.

4. What is effective in terms of the shape, scale and number of the two square elements in the Duveen Galleries?

The galleries use of shape and scale are effective in that they give a person a lasting first impression by the roofs being much higher and giving people and massive vertical experience, and there space does not take up much horizontal space so it gives each person a presence based on its vertical axis condition.

5. Describe the differences and similarities between Barnett Newman's and Richard Serra's work.

Both deal with basic geometric shapes in different proportions so that people can remember their work based on its scale rather than its color’s or positioning.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Essay Subjects

Section of Theme's : Borders that Control / Walls that Layer / Pockets that offer Choice and Changer

Section of Condition : Types that Recur / Orders that come and go 

Site Plan Diagrams Practice